FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro 460
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 460. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 460. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 75 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |