FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro 560X
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro 560X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 82 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 480 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 39% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 19% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 47% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 31% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon Pro 560X vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon Pro 560X vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX Vega 7
- Radeon Pro 560X vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
- Radeon Pro 560X vs Radeon RX Vega 7