FireStream 9370 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 43% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K2000D
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 8870M