FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 257 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 1% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Cypress | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX250
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2