FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R7 M370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon R7 M370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Radeon R7 M370, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Radeon R7 M370 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 50 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Radeon R7 M370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Cypress | Litho |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |