FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R7 M460
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Radeon R7 M460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Radeon R7 M460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M460 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M460.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M460 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 M460 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M460 is 159 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M460 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M460.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M460. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon R7 M460 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Cypress | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 21 February 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 984 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Check Price |