FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R9 M370X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon R9 M370X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Radeon R9 M370X, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M370X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Radeon R9 M370X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Cypress | Cape Verde |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 19 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1500 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 125 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |