FireStream 9370 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 5% more power consumption, than FireStream 9370.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- FireStream 9370 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2070.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1612 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 29% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Cypress | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 590
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost