FireStream 9370 vs Tesla M2070 Q

In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FireStream 9370

Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
FireStream 9370 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
FireStream 9370 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1468 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	1−2
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	8−9
ultra / 1080p	18−20	6−7
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	21−24
medium / 1080p	21−24	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9370 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	120−130
medium / 768p	160−170	100−110
ultra / 1080p	85−90	50−55
QHD / 1440p	45−50	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	120−130	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	85−90	55−60
ultra / 1080p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	4−5
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	1−2
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	85−90	60−65
medium / 1080p	45−50	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	8−9
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	21−24
medium / 1080p	24−27	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	75−80	50−55
medium / 768p	65−70	−
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	8−9	2−3
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	9−10
medium / 1080p	10−12	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	8−9
medium / 1080p	14−16	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	45−50	20−22
medium / 768p	27−30	12−14
high / 1080p	16−18	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	5−6
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	55−60	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	Cypress	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1600	448
Core clock speed	825 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s

FireStream 9370 vs Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares