FireStream 9370 vs UHD Graphics 620
When comparing FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics 620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics 620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- UHD Graphics 620 has 28 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 48% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 104% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 14% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than UHD Graphics 620. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 62% more, than UHD Graphics 620. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | UHD Graphics 620 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | Cypress | Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 27.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- UHD Graphics 620 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- UHD Graphics 620 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 4850
- UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
- UHD Graphics 620 vs Radeon HD 4850