GeForce 720A vs GeForce GTS 160M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 720A stacks up against GeForce GTS 160M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 720A
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce 720A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce 720A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 720A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 725 MHz higher, than GeForce 720A.
- GeForce 720A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 720A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 720A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | G9x |
| Code name | GF117 | N10E-GS1 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 July 2014 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 938 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 15.01 | 19 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 360.2 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |