GeForce 720A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between GeForce 720A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 720A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce 720A
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 720A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 720A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 720A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 720A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 720A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 720A is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce 720A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 720A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 720A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 720A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 720A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GF117 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 July 2014 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 938 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 15.01 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 360.2 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 720A vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- GeForce 720A vs Radeon R7 A360
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 A360
- GeForce 720A vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce 720A vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2