GeForce 720A vs Radeon Pro 560
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 720A and Radeon Pro 560, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 720A stacks up against Radeon Pro 560, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 720A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 720A | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560 has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 720A.
- GeForce 720A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 720A.
- GeForce 720A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 720A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 132 MHz higher, than GeForce 720A.
- GeForce 720A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 3080 MHz higher, than GeForce 720A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 720A and Radeon Pro 560 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 720A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 720A | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GF117 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2014 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost Clock | 938 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 15.01 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 360.2 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |