GeForce 720A vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 720A and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 720A and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 720A
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 720A | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 720A is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 720A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GeForce 720A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 720A and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 720A and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 720A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 720A | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GF117 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 July 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 938 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 15.01 | |
| Floating-point performance | 360.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 720A vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- GeForce 720A vs Radeon R7 A360
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R7 A360
- GeForce 720A vs GeForce GTX 950
- GeForce 720A vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100