FirePro S10000 vs GeForce 820A
When comparing FirePro S10000 and GeForce 820A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce 820A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S10000
GeForce 820A
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 820A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FirePro S10000 has 4900% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 820A uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 820A - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce 820A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce 820A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce 820A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce 820A | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | GF117 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 775 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 585 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 12.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |