FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 820A
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce 820A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and GeForce 820A.
FireStream 9370
GeForce 820A
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 820A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 820A - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 820A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce 820A | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Cypress | GF117 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 12.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |