GeForce 820A vs GeForce 9800 GTX
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others GeForce 9800 GTX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
GeForce 9800 GTX
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | GeForce 9800 GTX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 833% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 511 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 9800 GTX - with Tesla.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 913 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800 GTX - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | GeForce 9800 GTX | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GF117 | G92 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 March 2008 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1688 MHz |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 754 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 43.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 70.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |