GeForce 820A vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
When comparing GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800M GT SLI, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 820A and GeForce 9800M GT SLI is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 820A
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce 9800M GT SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 766% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 511 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 275 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800M GT SLI - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 207% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | − | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce 9800M GT SLI | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | G9x |
Code name | GF117 | NB9E-GT2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 15 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |