GeForce 820A vs GeForce GT 735M
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 735M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
GeForce GT 735M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 735M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 735M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GT 735M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 735M has 120% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 735M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GT 735M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 735M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 735M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 735M.
- GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M is 1800 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GT 735M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | N14M-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 889 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 39 Mh/s | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |