GeForce 820A vs GeForce MX350
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 820A and GeForce MX350, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 820A stacks up against GeForce MX350, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 820A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce MX350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce MX350 has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX350 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 579 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 5200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 475% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce MX350 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GF117 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 29.98 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 6.1 |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |