GeForce 820A vs GeForce MX450
When choosing between GeForce 820A and GeForce MX450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and GeForce MX450.
GeForce 820A
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce MX450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce MX450 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX450 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 620 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 8202 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce MX450 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce MX450 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | GF117 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 96 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 100.8 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 7.5 |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |