GeForce 820A vs GRID M60 1Q
When choosing between GeForce 820A and GRID M60 1Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and GRID M60 1Q.
GeForce 820A
GRID M60 1Q
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M60 1Q has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 820A and GRID M60 1Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 218 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce 820A and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 100−105 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 820A and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 513% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GF117 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.2 |