GeForce 820A vs GRID M60 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and GRID M60 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and GRID M60 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
GRID M60 8Q
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 218 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GeForce 820A and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 820A and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 296% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GF117 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 5.2 |