Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    GeForce 820A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

    When comparing GeForce 820A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 820A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    GeForce 820A
    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      GeForce 820A Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 15 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x1
    Memory type DDR3 System Shared
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price
    • Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 15 Watt.
    • GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
    • GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
    • GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
    • Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
    • GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 4−5
    ultra / 1080p − 3−4
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 1−2 12−14
    medium / 1080p 0−1 5−6
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 820A.

    Full Specs

      GeForce 820A Iris Pro Graphics 6200
    Architecture Fermi 2.0 Gen. 8 Broadwell
    Code name GF117 Broadwell GT3e
    Type Desktop Laptop
    Release date 17 March 2014 2 June 2015
    Pipelines 96 48
    Core clock speed 775 MHz 300 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz
    Transistor count 585 million 189 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
    Texture fill rate 12.40 40.80
    Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops 883.2 gflops
    Memory bus width 64 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.4
    OpenCL 1.1 2.0
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.80
    CUDA 2.1
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares