GeForce 820A vs Quadro M620
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and Quadro M620. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and Quadro M620. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | Quadro M620 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M620 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- Quadro M620 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 243 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A and Quadro M620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M620. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | Quadro M620 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GF117 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1018 MHz |
| Transistor count | 585 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |