GeForce 820A vs Radeon R7 A360
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
Radeon R7 A360
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
- GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 1797 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 820A and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GF117 | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |