GeForce 820A vs Radeon R9 M365X
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 125 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 141% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 73% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | − | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF117 | Tropo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |