GeForce 820A vs Radeon R9 M395X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M395X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M395X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 1566% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 52 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 550 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 559% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 925% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | GF117 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |