FirePro V4900 vs GeForce 825M
When comparing FirePro V4900 and GeForce 825M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and GeForce 825M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce 825M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
33 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 825M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce 825M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 825M - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 825M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 50 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 825M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
0−1
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
2−3
medium / 1080p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
35−40
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V4900 and GeForce 825M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
55−60
medium / 768p
90−95
30−33
ultra / 1080p
40−45
6−7
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
65−70
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 182% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
4−5
−
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
7−8
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
18−20
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
2−3
−
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
5−6
0−1
medium / 1080p
3−4
−
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
high / 1080p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
24−27
10−11
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 720p
6−7
0−1
low / 768p
12−14
0−1
medium / 768p
10−11
−
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
0−1
high / 768p
30−33
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce 825M
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Code name
Turks
GK208
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
27 January 2014
Pipelines
480
384
Core clock speed
800 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
30.11
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
722.7 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price