GeForce 825M vs GRID K220Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 825M and GRID K220Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 825M stacks up against GRID K220Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K220Q
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K220Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 450% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Dota 2 is 58% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| GeForce 825M and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |