GeForce 825M vs GRID M6 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and GRID M6 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others GRID M6 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 128 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GeForce 825M and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1750% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 825M and GRID M6 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 205% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 330% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 825M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GK208 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 27 January 2014 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 722 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |