GeForce 825M vs HD Graphics P630
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 825M and HD Graphics P630. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 825M and HD Graphics P630. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
HD Graphics P630
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | HD Graphics P630 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1740 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 825M has 120% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and HD Graphics P630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1738 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and HD Graphics P630 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics P630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics P630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 650% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 825M and HD Graphics P630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics P630 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | HD Graphics P630 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GK208 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 5 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 26.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |