GeForce 825M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 655, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 825M stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 655, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 825M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
2−3
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1300% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
55−60
190−200
medium / 768p
30−33
160−170
ultra / 1080p
6−7
85−90
QHD / 1440p
−
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
18−20
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
100−110
medium / 768p
14−16
85−90
ultra / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 166% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
85−90
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
low / 768p
18−20
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
50−55
95−100
medium / 1080p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
10−11
50−55
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 270% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
45−50
medium / 768p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
16−18
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GK208
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2014
1 September 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
850 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1200 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
50.40
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price