GeForce 825M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
160−170
medium / 768p
30−33
130−140
ultra / 1080p
6−7
65−70
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
18−20
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
18−20
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
95−100
ultra / 1080p
50−55
85−90
medium / 1080p
75−80
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
10−11
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 200% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
16−18
50−55
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
GK208
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2014
5 June 2013
Pipelines
384
40
Core clock speed
850 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1300 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
52.00
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price