GeForce 825M vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce 825M Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 580 Check Price

GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:

GeForce 825M Laptops

Iris Pro Graphics 580 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 825M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	2−3	20−22
medium / 1080p	0−1	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 950% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	150−160
medium / 768p	30−33	130−140
ultra / 1080p	6−7	65−70
QHD / 1440p	−	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	18−20	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 303% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	70−75
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	0−1	18−20
low / 768p	18−20	60−65
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	8−9
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
high / 1080p	60−65	95−100
ultra / 1080p	50−55	85−90
medium / 1080p	75−80	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 39% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	0−1	30−35
medium / 768p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	16−18	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
high / 768p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 825M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 825M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name	GK208	Skylake GT4e
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	27 January 2014	1 September 2015
Pipelines	384	72
Core clock speed	850 MHz	350 MHz
Boost Clock	941 MHz	1050 MHz
Transistor count	915 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	30.11	72.00
Floating-point performance	722.7 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.97
CUDA	+
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
Quick Sync		+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

GeForce 825M and Iris Pro Graphics 580 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares