GeForce 825M vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing GeForce 825M and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 87% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 825M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 800 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 72% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 22% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK208 | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |