GeForce 825M vs Quadro FX 3800
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Quadro FX 3800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 3800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 227% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 825M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 825M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Dota 2 is 52% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 80% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |