GeForce 825M vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between GeForce 825M and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 825M and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 248 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 825M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 22% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 825M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK208 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 27 January 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |