GeForce 825M vs Quadro K4000

When comparing GeForce 825M and Quadro K4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and Quadro K4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce 825M Check Price

Quadro K4000 Check Price

GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:

GeForce 825M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 825M	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4000 has 142% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4000 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4000 - in Desktops.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K4000 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 40 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4000 is 3816 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	2−3	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1300% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	55−60	200−210
medium / 768p	30−33	170−180
ultra / 1080p	6−7	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	18−20	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	100−110
medium / 768p	14−16	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 172% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	90−95
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	75−80	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 54% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	10−11	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 270% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−105
medium / 768p	16−18	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 825M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 825M	Quadro K4000
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK208	GK106
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	27 January 2014	1 March 2013
Pipelines	384	768
Core clock speed	850 MHz	810 MHz
Boost Clock	941 MHz
Transistor count	915 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.11	51.84
Floating-point performance	722.7 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		61 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M vs Quadro K4000

GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares