GeForce 825M vs Quadro K5000M
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Quadro K5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K5000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Quadro K5000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Quadro K5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5000M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K5000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K5000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 144 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
2−3
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1500% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
−
27−30
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
55−60
210−220
medium / 768p
30−33
180−190
ultra / 1080p
6−7
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
18−20
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
110−120
medium / 768p
14−16
95−100
ultra / 1080p
0−1
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
low / 768p
18−20
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 720p
10−11
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 340% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
0−1
55−60
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 200% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Quadro K5000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK208
N14E-Q5
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
27 January 2014
1 June 2012
Pipelines
384
1344
Core clock speed
850 MHz
706 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
67.31
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
1,615 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
+
Check Price
Check Price