GeForce 825M vs Quadro M2000
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 54 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
GeForce 825M and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4812 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
2−3
40−45
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce 825M and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
55−60
230−240
medium / 768p
30−33
200−210
ultra / 1080p
6−7
120−130
QHD / 1440p
−
90−95
4K / 2160p
−
50−55
high / 768p
18−20
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 42% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
120−130
medium / 768p
14−16
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 219% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
120−130
medium / 1080p
0−1
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
0−1
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
low / 768p
18−20
100−110
medium / 768p
−
95−100
high / 1080p
0−1
40−45
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
75−80
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
10−11
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 350% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
0−1
75−80
medium / 768p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
GK208
GM206
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
27 January 2014
8 April 2016
Pipelines
384
768
Core clock speed
850 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1163 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
55.82
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price