GeForce 825M vs Radeon Pro 460

When comparing GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 460, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 460 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce 825M Check Price

Radeon Pro 460 Check Price

GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Radeon Pro 460 here:

GeForce 825M Laptops

Radeon Pro 460 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 825M	Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro 460 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	2−3	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1750% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	220−230
medium / 768p	30−33	190−200
ultra / 1080p	6−7	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	35−40
high / 768p	18−20	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	110−120
medium / 768p	14−16	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 205% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 330% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	16−18	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 825M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 825M	Radeon Pro 460
Architecture	Kepler	Polaris
Code name	GK208	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 January 2014	8 August 2016
Pipelines	384	1024
Core clock speed	850 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock	941 MHz	907 MHz
Transistor count	915 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	30.11	58.05
Floating-point performance	722.7 gflops	1,858 gflops
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		227 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M vs Radeon Pro 460

GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares