GeForce 825M vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 555 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 555 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Radeon Pro 555
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 555 has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce 825M and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 5 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 3280 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
2−3
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1500% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
−
27−30
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
55−60
210−220
medium / 768p
30−33
180−190
ultra / 1080p
6−7
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
18−20
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
110−120
medium / 768p
14−16
95−100
ultra / 1080p
0−1
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
low / 768p
18−20
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 720p
10−11
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 340% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
0−1
55−60
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 200% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Radeon Pro 555
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK208
Polaris 21
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
27 January 2014
5 June 2017
Pipelines
384
768
Core clock speed
850 MHz
855 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
40.80
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
1,306 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
81.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price