GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 M270
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Radeon R7 M270
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
Not Listed
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
1−2
medium / 1080p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
30−33
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
high / 768p
18−20
16−18
GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
45−50
medium / 768p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
0−1
GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
0−1
0−1
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
18−20
18−20
high / 1080p
0−1
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
12−14
GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
low / 720p
10−11
8−9
medium / 1080p
10−11
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
low / 720p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
0−1
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
medium / 768p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
high / 768p
12−14
12−14
GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Radeon R7 M270
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
GK208
Opal XT / Mars
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2014
7 January 2014
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
850 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
19.80
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
633.6 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Not Listed
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Check Price
Check Price
