GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 825M is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 450% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 58% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |