GeForce 825M vs Radeon R7 M465X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M465X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M465X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M465X
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 825M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 2700 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 136% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 825M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |