GeForce 825M vs Tesla C2075

When comparing GeForce 825M and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce 825M Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:

GeForce 825M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce 825M	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 648% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	2−3	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1750% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	210−220
medium / 768p	30−33	190−200
ultra / 1080p	6−7	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	18−20	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p	55−60	110−120
medium / 768p	14−16	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 205% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	60−65
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	16−18	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 825M.

Full Specs

	GeForce 825M	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK208	GF110
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	27 January 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	384	448
Core clock speed	850 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	941 MHz
Transistor count	915 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	30.11	32.14
Floating-point performance	722.7 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce 825M vs Tesla C2075

GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares