GeForce 830A vs GeForce GTX 965M
When choosing between GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 965M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 965M.
GeForce 830A
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 830A | GeForce GTX 965M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 830A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 830A.
- GeForce 830A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 965M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830A is 138 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 965M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce 830A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 830A and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 108% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 237% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 33% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 830A | GeForce GTX 965M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM108 | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 22 July 2014 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 944 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 950 / 1151 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 73.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |