GeForce 830A vs Radeon Pro 455
In this comparison between GeForce 830A and Radeon Pro 455 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 830A will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 455 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 830A
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 830A | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 455 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 830A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 830A and Radeon Pro 455 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 830A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 830A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830A is 227 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
- GeForce 830A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 455 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 830A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 455. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 22% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce 830A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 830A | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM108 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 22 July 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 256 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 41.04 |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |