GeForce 830M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 830M and GeForce GTX 460 SE, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 830M stacks up against GeForce GTX 460 SE, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce 830M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 830M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 830M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 830M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 830M.
- GeForce 830M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 830M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce 830M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce 830M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 271 MHz higher, than GeForce 830M.
- GeForce 830M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 830M is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 78% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than GeForce 830M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce 830M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 830M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | N15? | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 256 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |